<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flowers From the Storm by Laura Kinsale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/20/flowers-from-the-storm-by-laura-kinsale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/20/flowers-from-the-storm-by-laura-kinsale/</link>
	<description>Guess what I&#039;m reading?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 07:49:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amarjaa</title>
		<link>http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/20/flowers-from-the-storm-by-laura-kinsale/#comment-3692</link>
		<dc:creator>Amarjaa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/20/flowers-from-the-storm-by-laura-kinsale/#comment-3692</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;There were times in the book where I just really wanted to reach into the pages, yank out Maddy, and snatch the bitch bald.&lt;/I&gt;

This pretty much summed up the entire book for me.  Liked Christian, loathed Maddy.

Fabulous review...so in-depth and you addressed a lot of the book&#039;s central problems!  I think it&#039;s a real tragedy that Kinsale chose to stick the hero with such a dour, joyless heroine with a limited capacity for understanding anything non-Quaker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>There were times in the book where I just really wanted to reach into the pages, yank out Maddy, and snatch the bitch bald.</i></p>
<p>This pretty much summed up the entire book for me.  Liked Christian, loathed Maddy.</p>
<p>Fabulous review&#8230;so in-depth and you addressed a lot of the book&#8217;s central problems!  I think it&#8217;s a real tragedy that Kinsale chose to stick the hero with such a dour, joyless heroine with a limited capacity for understanding anything non-Quaker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorrie Spencer</title>
		<link>http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/20/flowers-from-the-storm-by-laura-kinsale/#comment-3691</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorrie Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 12:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/20/flowers-from-the-storm-by-laura-kinsale/#comment-3691</guid>
		<description>Coming in a bit late. I loved FFtS enough to read it twice, when I am not much of a rereader. But it&#039;s not a perfect book, by any means. A friend of mine couldn&#039;t get through it because she found it dreary and lacking in humor. 

I&#039;ve heard that many Kinsale fans who don&#039;t like FFtS often like &lt;I&gt;The Shadow and the Star&lt;/I&gt;—which does have humor.

I think one of the things that astounded me with FFtS is the I have never felt the hero in a romance novel to be in such danger.

Cool review site, btw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coming in a bit late. I loved FFtS enough to read it twice, when I am not much of a rereader. But it&#8217;s not a perfect book, by any means. A friend of mine couldn&#8217;t get through it because she found it dreary and lacking in humor. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard that many Kinsale fans who don&#8217;t like FFtS often like <i>The Shadow and the Star</i>—which does have humor.</p>
<p>I think one of the things that astounded me with FFtS is the I have never felt the hero in a romance novel to be in such danger.</p>
<p>Cool review site, btw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Camilla</title>
		<link>http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/20/flowers-from-the-storm-by-laura-kinsale/#comment-3690</link>
		<dc:creator>Camilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 02:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/20/flowers-from-the-storm-by-laura-kinsale/#comment-3690</guid>
		<description>I found this book to be a yawner because unlike you, I found the character of Christian to be one-note. I would have believed his relationship with Maddy had we been able to see how he viewed Maddy before his stroke. I find it hard to believe that they would have ever fallen in love or even gave each other a second glance had he not had his stroke--and that&#039;s such a major hinge of the plot that it shows that without the stroke, this book wouldn&#039;t exist. Secondly, it was just too coincidental that Maddy&#039;s cousin ran the mental institution Christian was hosed in. Too coincidental. The middle rambled a bit and my eyes fell off a number of pages, but two main unresolved things stood out for me: a) Maddy&#039;s relationship with her father after she becomes Duchess is left unresolved(not to mention his thoughts about the duke and his lifestyle; he just shows up at the end as this benign old man) &amp; b) for all the drama Christian&#039;s family caused, they recieved lip service in the prologue. I was left scratching my head because when his mother was introduced, there was a fair bit about their relationship and then at the end, nothing is addressed. 

Maddy&#039;s Quakerness grew tired, but I understood her. But I was upset at Kinsale making it seem as though there were no &quot;grey&quot; areas in religion. I found it unbelievable that Maddy would give up her beliefs, something that has shaped and molded her personality whether for the good or the bad, at the drop of a hat. I would have found the ending much more satisfying had Maddy been able to reconcile her belief in God with being able to live her life instead of Quakerism being seen as a noose. (And I do agree that perhaps Kinsale mistook Puritanism for Quakerism.)

As for me, hile Kinsale can write like a goddess, I did not buy the relationship between Maddy and Christian, making the &lt;I&gt;romance&lt;/I&gt; a failure for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this book to be a yawner because unlike you, I found the character of Christian to be one-note. I would have believed his relationship with Maddy had we been able to see how he viewed Maddy before his stroke. I find it hard to believe that they would have ever fallen in love or even gave each other a second glance had he not had his stroke&#8211;and that&#8217;s such a major hinge of the plot that it shows that without the stroke, this book wouldn&#8217;t exist. Secondly, it was just too coincidental that Maddy&#8217;s cousin ran the mental institution Christian was hosed in. Too coincidental. The middle rambled a bit and my eyes fell off a number of pages, but two main unresolved things stood out for me: a) Maddy&#8217;s relationship with her father after she becomes Duchess is left unresolved(not to mention his thoughts about the duke and his lifestyle; he just shows up at the end as this benign old man) &amp; b) for all the drama Christian&#8217;s family caused, they recieved lip service in the prologue. I was left scratching my head because when his mother was introduced, there was a fair bit about their relationship and then at the end, nothing is addressed. </p>
<p>Maddy&#8217;s Quakerness grew tired, but I understood her. But I was upset at Kinsale making it seem as though there were no &#8220;grey&#8221; areas in religion. I found it unbelievable that Maddy would give up her beliefs, something that has shaped and molded her personality whether for the good or the bad, at the drop of a hat. I would have found the ending much more satisfying had Maddy been able to reconcile her belief in God with being able to live her life instead of Quakerism being seen as a noose. (And I do agree that perhaps Kinsale mistook Puritanism for Quakerism.)</p>
<p>As for me, hile Kinsale can write like a goddess, I did not buy the relationship between Maddy and Christian, making the <i>romance</i> a failure for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer R</title>
		<link>http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/20/flowers-from-the-storm-by-laura-kinsale/#comment-3689</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 22:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/20/flowers-from-the-storm-by-laura-kinsale/#comment-3689</guid>
		<description>I always thought the plot of this book sounded godawful depressing, and well...nice to have it confirmed so that I&#039;ll never pick it up.

I hate religious fanatic-types anyway, but guh! How irritating!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always thought the plot of this book sounded godawful depressing, and well&#8230;nice to have it confirmed so that I&#8217;ll never pick it up.</p>
<p>I hate religious fanatic-types anyway, but guh! How irritating!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bam</title>
		<link>http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/20/flowers-from-the-storm-by-laura-kinsale/#comment-3688</link>
		<dc:creator>Bam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 May 2006 23:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/20/flowers-from-the-storm-by-laura-kinsale/#comment-3688</guid>
		<description>Wow, SKapusniak... I didn&#039;t understand half of what you said, but that shit was  &lt;I&gt;hawt&lt;/I&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, SKapusniak&#8230; I didn&#8217;t understand half of what you said, but that shit was  <i>hawt</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SKapusniak</title>
		<link>http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/20/flowers-from-the-storm-by-laura-kinsale/#comment-3687</link>
		<dc:creator>SKapusniak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 May 2006 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/20/flowers-from-the-storm-by-laura-kinsale/#comment-3687</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Maddy realizes that he may not be so bad, especially since he offers her father a math chair at the university&lt;/I&gt;

Umm, assuming that this is in the early 19th century I&#039;m not sure it was *legal* for anyone who was not Church of England to hold a math chair at a University, any more than it was for a Quaker to stand for parliament.  University Test Acts and such.

That&#039;s why all the famous Quakers in Britain before about 1832 are Industrialists, Merchants, Bankers and the like.  

The are also a few people in fields like politics who seem have flown under a flag of convenience by being officially C. of E. but actually attend Quaker meetings instead of going to church.

So it wouldn&#039;t be that Quakers shunned the world, it&#039;s that Quakers and other Nonconformists, being mostly a bunch of radical reform liberals at the progressive end of the Whig party -- variously agitating against slavery, the corn laws, and for women&#039;s rights, and prison (cf Elizabeth Fry), electoral and other reforms --  with a lot of money and influence outside parliament, and the wrong religion, would be &#039;not at all respectable&#039; to mainstream opinion.

Trying to think how to put this in contempary US terms (difficult because I&#039;m an Englishman living Scotland).  Okay, a large number of mini-Bill Gates&#039;s, and their families, friends and associates, who employ lots of people across the nation, but are also prominent and outspoken atheists -- therefore both scarily religiously different, and completely unelectable to any public office -- with political views somewhere to the left of Michael Moore.

Disclaimer: I haven&#039;t read the book, and am not Quaker, but did attend society of friends meetings with my mother for about a year when I was 10.  However, mostly I remember feeding the tortoise that lived in the grounds of the meeting house with dandelions :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Maddy realizes that he may not be so bad, especially since he offers her father a math chair at the university</i></p>
<p>Umm, assuming that this is in the early 19th century I&#8217;m not sure it was *legal* for anyone who was not Church of England to hold a math chair at a University, any more than it was for a Quaker to stand for parliament.  University Test Acts and such.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why all the famous Quakers in Britain before about 1832 are Industrialists, Merchants, Bankers and the like.  </p>
<p>The are also a few people in fields like politics who seem have flown under a flag of convenience by being officially C. of E. but actually attend Quaker meetings instead of going to church.</p>
<p>So it wouldn&#8217;t be that Quakers shunned the world, it&#8217;s that Quakers and other Nonconformists, being mostly a bunch of radical reform liberals at the progressive end of the Whig party &#8212; variously agitating against slavery, the corn laws, and for women&#8217;s rights, and prison (cf Elizabeth Fry), electoral and other reforms &#8212;  with a lot of money and influence outside parliament, and the wrong religion, would be &#8216;not at all respectable&#8217; to mainstream opinion.</p>
<p>Trying to think how to put this in contempary US terms (difficult because I&#8217;m an Englishman living Scotland).  Okay, a large number of mini-Bill Gates&#8217;s, and their families, friends and associates, who employ lots of people across the nation, but are also prominent and outspoken atheists &#8212; therefore both scarily religiously different, and completely unelectable to any public office &#8212; with political views somewhere to the left of Michael Moore.</p>
<p>Disclaimer: I haven&#8217;t read the book, and am not Quaker, but did attend society of friends meetings with my mother for about a year when I was 10.  However, mostly I remember feeding the tortoise that lived in the grounds of the meeting house with dandelions <img src='http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karla</title>
		<link>http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/20/flowers-from-the-storm-by-laura-kinsale/#comment-3686</link>
		<dc:creator>Karla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 May 2006 17:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/20/flowers-from-the-storm-by-laura-kinsale/#comment-3686</guid>
		<description>This was by far one of the worst Kinsale books ever.  If you try For My Lady&#039;s Honour or Shadowheart (very very good) I think you might find Kinsale more on par with her praises.

Flowers was a superbly executed book but with a heroine who made it an unpleassant read.  Had Maddy&#039;s quakerism been toned down a bit or even just allowed her to compromise, it would have been a more enjoyable romance.  As it was you feel pity for the hero that he gets stuck with such a horrible sour woman, who looks on him as a duty and isn&#039;t too pleased that she loved him or that he reciprocates her love.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was by far one of the worst Kinsale books ever.  If you try For My Lady&#8217;s Honour or Shadowheart (very very good) I think you might find Kinsale more on par with her praises.</p>
<p>Flowers was a superbly executed book but with a heroine who made it an unpleassant read.  Had Maddy&#8217;s quakerism been toned down a bit or even just allowed her to compromise, it would have been a more enjoyable romance.  As it was you feel pity for the hero that he gets stuck with such a horrible sour woman, who looks on him as a duty and isn&#8217;t too pleased that she loved him or that he reciprocates her love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bam</title>
		<link>http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/20/flowers-from-the-storm-by-laura-kinsale/#comment-3685</link>
		<dc:creator>Bam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 May 2006 00:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/20/flowers-from-the-storm-by-laura-kinsale/#comment-3685</guid>
		<description>Kat, I didn&#039;t think that &quot;puritan&quot; and &quot;quaker&quot; meant the same thing, either. I was majorly wigged (heh, I almost typed &quot;whig&quot;) out by the &quot;Friends&quot; who came to see her at the ball. Why would they come to the biggest event of the Season if they shun the rest of the world? Would they brave the crowds of heathens just to save one little Friend? 

Wendy, I thought a lot about putting it down, but I persevered. I don&#039;t like not finishing something once I start it. I&#039;m almost OCD about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kat, I didn&#8217;t think that &#8220;puritan&#8221; and &#8220;quaker&#8221; meant the same thing, either. I was majorly wigged (heh, I almost typed &#8220;whig&#8221;) out by the &#8220;Friends&#8221; who came to see her at the ball. Why would they come to the biggest event of the Season if they shun the rest of the world? Would they brave the crowds of heathens just to save one little Friend? </p>
<p>Wendy, I thought a lot about putting it down, but I persevered. I don&#8217;t like not finishing something once I start it. I&#8217;m almost OCD about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kat</title>
		<link>http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/20/flowers-from-the-storm-by-laura-kinsale/#comment-3684</link>
		<dc:creator>Kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 23:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/20/flowers-from-the-storm-by-laura-kinsale/#comment-3684</guid>
		<description>I read FFtS recently. I have to say, I enjoyed it a lot, but I agree with many of your critiques. 

Especially when it came to Maddy -- or, should I say, Maddy&#039;s Quakerism. I went to a Quaker-run school during my teenage years, complete with daily Meetings for Worship, and a more accepting, open-minded, peaceful religion I don&#039;t think EXISTS today. (Though I admit to knowing bupkis about Buddhism.) Now, for all I know, there have been a lot of changes in doctrine over past centuries, but... damn. Kinsdale is a master scribbler, but I have to wonder if she didn&#039;t fudge around with her religious sects when writing this. FFtS seems to think &quot;Puritain&quot; and &quot;Quaker&quot; are somewhat interchangable, which so wrong in so many ways, I don&#039;t even know where to begin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read FFtS recently. I have to say, I enjoyed it a lot, but I agree with many of your critiques. </p>
<p>Especially when it came to Maddy &#8212; or, should I say, Maddy&#8217;s Quakerism. I went to a Quaker-run school during my teenage years, complete with daily Meetings for Worship, and a more accepting, open-minded, peaceful religion I don&#8217;t think EXISTS today. (Though I admit to knowing bupkis about Buddhism.) Now, for all I know, there have been a lot of changes in doctrine over past centuries, but&#8230; damn. Kinsdale is a master scribbler, but I have to wonder if she didn&#8217;t fudge around with her religious sects when writing this. FFtS seems to think &#8220;Puritain&#8221; and &#8220;Quaker&#8221; are somewhat interchangable, which so wrong in so many ways, I don&#8217;t even know where to begin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy</title>
		<link>http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/20/flowers-from-the-storm-by-laura-kinsale/#comment-3683</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 21:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/20/flowers-from-the-storm-by-laura-kinsale/#comment-3683</guid>
		<description>You did better than I did.  I got to page 150 then gave up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You did better than I did.  I got to page 150 then gave up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

