<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maybe it IS Chick Porn!</title>
	<link>http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/23/maybe-it-is-chick-porn/</link>
	<description>it's not chick porn</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Kat O+</title>
		<link>http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/23/maybe-it-is-chick-porn/#comment-1251</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 14:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/23/maybe-it-is-chick-porn/#comment-1251</guid>
					<description>OMG, he has two bellybuttons!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG, he has two bellybuttons!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kate R</title>
		<link>http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/23/maybe-it-is-chick-porn/#comment-1250</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 23:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/23/maybe-it-is-chick-porn/#comment-1250</guid>
					<description>who is laura and why is she doing this to us????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who is laura and why is she doing this to us????
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: einsteinella</title>
		<link>http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/23/maybe-it-is-chick-porn/#comment-1249</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/23/maybe-it-is-chick-porn/#comment-1249</guid>
					<description>Does nothing for me as he is obviously not ready for action. And, hey, dude, ever heard of Mystic Tan??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does nothing for me as he is obviously not ready for action. And, hey, dude, ever heard of Mystic Tan??
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sandie</title>
		<link>http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/23/maybe-it-is-chick-porn/#comment-1248</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 16:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/23/maybe-it-is-chick-porn/#comment-1248</guid>
					<description>You know...I wonder about this model. Do you think he posed for a porn photo layout?? Think he was brought into a studio and they just turned the lights on and bam, there ya go?

Yeah, people really look down their noses at romance because of covers just like this. Which just kills me...

I'm with Shuzluva on the pre-occupation with man booby...just, um, don't understand it.

Also, the anal designer in me wants to point out that the shadow on the apple is not consistent with the shadow cast on the models body...wonder what % they had to increase the image of that apple to cover his twig &#38; nuts??
Laura</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know&#8230;I wonder about this model. Do you think he posed for a porn photo layout?? Think he was brought into a studio and they just turned the lights on and bam, there ya go?</p>
<p>Yeah, people really look down their noses at romance because of covers just like this. Which just kills me&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with Shuzluva on the pre-occupation with man booby&#8230;just, um, don&#8217;t understand it.</p>
<p>Also, the anal designer in me wants to point out that the shadow on the apple is not consistent with the shadow cast on the models body&#8230;wonder what % they had to increase the image of that apple to cover his twig &amp; nuts??<br />
Laura
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Danielle</title>
		<link>http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/23/maybe-it-is-chick-porn/#comment-1247</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 23:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/23/maybe-it-is-chick-porn/#comment-1247</guid>
					<description>I'm more perturbed by the body hair.  I think body hair should be banned from models, male or female.  (Asides from the hair on their craniums.)  Because it always looks like it was glued on by a second grader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m more perturbed by the body hair.  I think body hair should be banned from models, male or female.  (Asides from the hair on their craniums.)  Because it always looks like it was glued on by a second grader.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bam</title>
		<link>http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/23/maybe-it-is-chick-porn/#comment-1246</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 22:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/23/maybe-it-is-chick-porn/#comment-1246</guid>
					<description>&lt;I&gt;Sorry for the rant Bam&lt;/I&gt;

Rants of all kind are welcome here, dude. You know that. It's cool. Shake ya tailfeather.

A coworker just passed by, looked over my shoulder, and saw the cover. She asked what the hell it was. I told her it was a cover for an erotic romance. She said, "Huh. That's why I don't read that trash. It looks like porn."

Okay, so she's a snobby asshole. But she has a point, even if she's being a snobby asshole about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><I>Sorry for the rant Bam</I></p>
<p>Rants of all kind are welcome here, dude. You know that. It&#8217;s cool. Shake ya tailfeather.</p>
<p>A coworker just passed by, looked over my shoulder, and saw the cover. She asked what the hell it was. I told her it was a cover for an erotic romance. She said, &#8220;Huh. That&#8217;s why I don&#8217;t read that trash. It looks like porn.&#8221;</p>
<p>Okay, so she&#8217;s a snobby asshole. But she has a point, even if she&#8217;s being a snobby asshole about it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Shuzluva</title>
		<link>http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/23/maybe-it-is-chick-porn/#comment-1245</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 22:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/23/maybe-it-is-chick-porn/#comment-1245</guid>
					<description>I read the SBTB interview with the Ellora's Cave folks and I just can't understand something. WHO ARE THESE READERS ASKING FOR THESE TYPES OF COVERS? WHAT IS THE FIXATION WITH MANTITTY? There must be hoards of readers asking for them because they keep popping up.  

I love me my naked men, but I have a hard time bringing them to the beach for an enjoyable read. And, if I'm going to be perfectly honest, I don't see tons of men reading Playboy or Penthouse on the beach - unless they're hiding them behind another magazine - which I'm seriously tempted to do with covers like these. 

Sad, but true...the most innocuous covers appeal to me due to my deep embarassment of being caught reading romance/romantica/erotica. I know, sad, sad, sad. Especially 'cause so many of these books are so good.

Sorry for the rant Bam, but I saw that naked chest and a switch just got flipped, and not in a good way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the SBTB interview with the Ellora&#8217;s Cave folks and I just can&#8217;t understand something. WHO ARE THESE READERS ASKING FOR THESE TYPES OF COVERS? WHAT IS THE FIXATION WITH MANTITTY? There must be hoards of readers asking for them because they keep popping up.  </p>
<p>I love me my naked men, but I have a hard time bringing them to the beach for an enjoyable read. And, if I&#8217;m going to be perfectly honest, I don&#8217;t see tons of men reading Playboy or Penthouse on the beach - unless they&#8217;re hiding them behind another magazine - which I&#8217;m seriously tempted to do with covers like these. </p>
<p>Sad, but true&#8230;the most innocuous covers appeal to me due to my deep embarassment of being caught reading romance/romantica/erotica. I know, sad, sad, sad. Especially &#8217;cause so many of these books are so good.</p>
<p>Sorry for the rant Bam, but I saw that naked chest and a switch just got flipped, and not in a good way.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: web</title>
		<link>http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/23/maybe-it-is-chick-porn/#comment-1244</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 21:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/23/maybe-it-is-chick-porn/#comment-1244</guid>
					<description>Wait, isn't porn supposed to be *attractive*? The sleeze factor is the *least* of what's wrong with that cover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, isn&#8217;t porn supposed to be *attractive*? The sleeze factor is the *least* of what&#8217;s wrong with that cover.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Evan</title>
		<link>http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/23/maybe-it-is-chick-porn/#comment-1243</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 21:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/23/maybe-it-is-chick-porn/#comment-1243</guid>
					<description>Think of it as a Magritte allusion.  There.  Doesn't it seem classier now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think of it as a Magritte allusion.  There.  Doesn&#8217;t it seem classier now?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: web</title>
		<link>http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/23/maybe-it-is-chick-porn/#comment-1242</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 21:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/05/23/maybe-it-is-chick-porn/#comment-1242</guid>
					<description>It burnssss us! It burnssss us!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It burnssss us! It burnssss us!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.450 seconds -->
