<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Says Christian Chicks Can&#8217;t Have Fun?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/11/07/who-says-christian-chicks-cant-have-fun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/11/07/who-says-christian-chicks-cant-have-fun/</link>
	<description>Guess what I&#039;m reading?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 07:49:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie Kessler</title>
		<link>http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/11/07/who-says-christian-chicks-cant-have-fun/#comment-4248</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie Kessler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/11/07/who-says-christian-chicks-cant-have-fun/#comment-4248</guid>
		<description>Me, I think there&#039;s a split personality thing going on with the gal. Look at the right side of her face -- there&#039;s a Mona Lisa smile going on there. Left side? A scowl/frown/don&#039;t piss me off look. Does inspirational mean no plunging neck line? Or hint of a feminine figure? Look at how the spotlight is on her torso. Isn&#039;t that weird, considering that all it&#039;s highlighting is her tucked in proper white blouse? Even Diane Chambers would have shown more skin. Humble opinion, a&#039;course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me, I think there&#8217;s a split personality thing going on with the gal. Look at the right side of her face &#8212; there&#8217;s a Mona Lisa smile going on there. Left side? A scowl/frown/don&#8217;t piss me off look. Does inspirational mean no plunging neck line? Or hint of a feminine figure? Look at how the spotlight is on her torso. Isn&#8217;t that weird, considering that all it&#8217;s highlighting is her tucked in proper white blouse? Even Diane Chambers would have shown more skin. Humble opinion, a&#8217;course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annie Dean</title>
		<link>http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/11/07/who-says-christian-chicks-cant-have-fun/#comment-4244</link>
		<dc:creator>Annie Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 23:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dionnegalace.com/wordpress/2006/11/07/who-says-christian-chicks-cant-have-fun/#comment-4244</guid>
		<description>Blue Shirt looks like a young Alan Thicke and Black Jacket looks like Lorenzo Lamas, pre-Falcon Crest, and yeah, they are totally into each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blue Shirt looks like a young Alan Thicke and Black Jacket looks like Lorenzo Lamas, pre-Falcon Crest, and yeah, they are totally into each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

