Comments on: Kiki Dunst Must be Spinning in Her Grave

by: Flo

Fri, 01 Jun 2007 22:16:46 +0000

Hahahaha Whitey totally has a peener. I pointed and laughed at the monitor when I clicked on that link.

And yeah, it’s hard finding a comic that isn’t specifically drawn FOR men BY men to get MEN fap fap fapping away while imagining that MJ or the White Queen would bend them over and teach them how to be a good little boy.

As for people who power game and stink… I do not resemble that stinking part! *sniffs pits*

by: Kathleen

Wed, 30 May 2007 17:40:50 +0000

Okay, yes, thank you. I thought I was a perv for noticing Whitey came with a penis. Is it like a bonus attachment? Is she, like, for closet-case comic fans? MJ here is clearly for the still-virginal contingent.
Listen, no real woman is going to react with coy delight when she finds out her boyfriend is keeping a major secret. Slap some rage on her face, deflate the girls and give her an outfit she can breathe in, and then you’re talking.

by: BernardL

Wed, 30 May 2007 16:37:34 +0000

I’m not calling anyone stupid, or paying a hundred thirty bucks for a comic statue; but all in all, it’s not bad. As dillene says, you should see Witchblade and Fathom. The statue illustrates the ‘Nip/Tuck’ craze sweeping away sanity in the heads of women, spending small fortunes to look exactly like that very statue. Ugh! This all reminds me of Mrs. Robinson’s husband in “The Graduate” giving Benjamin the one word to remember at his graduation party: Plastic.

by: Emily Veinglory

Wed, 30 May 2007 16:05:38 +0000

That change to that kind of boobs and anorexia (combined presumably by the use of a lot of silicone) is the main reason I stopped getting comics in the early 90s. When rendered in three (double) D the stupidity of the degree of anatomical distortion is all the more obvious. That and neither DC nor Marvel had a decent female lead that they could resist torturing to semi-naked-erotic death (no I *still* haven’t recovered from what they did to Batgirl).

by: dl

Wed, 30 May 2007 15:48:57 +0000

When confronted with this stuff, I assume:
#1 The illustrator flunked anatomy class.
#2 The illustrator has no real life experience with naked women due to his personal scent of dirt sox and BO (this phenomenon also applies to computer geeks and obsessive gamers). These pathetic souls usually lack social skills, and are actively avoided by all sane females.
#3 The illustrator is a pig and a pervert.

Kathleen…The White Queen is missing basic anatomy parts (see #1 above) that would be visible in a corset cut this low. She has no nipples and a definate package?!

IMO if these were actual photographs instead of illustrations, alot of comics would be required to be labeled and sold as porn. (or at least erotica).

by: mee

Wed, 30 May 2007 09:59:14 +0000

Comics do have a habit of flaunting corsets and skin-tights.

Mary Jane is just so out of proportion it looks freaky and that pose coupled with the backward look made me wonder what was happening off screen. Is there going to be an accompanying Spiddy statue that slots in behind?

by: December Quinn

Wed, 30 May 2007 07:40:35 +0000

It’s sold out, Shiloh.

You should see some of the statues of Power Girl out there…

by: Shiloh

Wed, 30 May 2007 02:28:55 +0000

uh… this is a statue that people are actually buying????

Hmmmmm…..

by: Charlene

Tue, 29 May 2007 23:43:53 +0000

The guys who have been defending this (and most have been incredibly touchy) on various websites have been calling critics who complain about it “stupid”.

The statuette costs $129.99 US. ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTY DOLLARS.

And they call the critics stupid??

by: Darragha

Tue, 29 May 2007 23:40:55 +0000

Ah, another glorified personification of the average American woman!